FAQFAQ
   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
#1 In Identity Theft Protection



Your Maine Forum Forum Index -> Politics

Susan Collins says yes to Sotomayor


Post new topic   Reply to topic
  Author    Thread
Neal
Wanna-be Mainah


Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 47
Location: Maine


 Reply with quote  
Susan Collins says yes to Sotomayor

This is a bad development for gun owners. Sotomayor is a gun grabber's dream come true.
_________________
Former California resident who loves Maine

Post Sat 25 Jul, 2009 7:01 am 
 View user's profile Send private message
Haley
Mosquito


Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 162



 Reply with quote  

Neal, there are so many guns in America that if this Sotomayor would spear head a drive to rid America of guns it would make a life time appointment moot.

I read the 2nd Amendment. I don't care how the US Supreme Court rules on it, the 2nd Amendment says what it says and means what it means. Period.

Post Sat 25 Jul, 2009 10:41 am 
 View user's profile Send private message
PaulaJane
Moose


Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 795
Location: Maine


 Reply with quote  

So what are you injecting here Haley? That no matter what the 'other government' says, they can't take our guns away?
_________________
"What goes around, comes around" When it does, watch out!!!

Post Tue 28 Jul, 2009 9:45 am 
 View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
renadewalt
Wanna-be Mainah


Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 35



 Reply with quote  

One thing I've learned about political arguments is you can't change a person's mind unless they are open to change. Still, it's a great temptation to fight.

The first noticeable thing for me about the 2nd Amendment is that it's an "Amendment." Ratified by a majority in the Houses and individual states. These can be rescinded the same way, "rescission of a prior ratification." Interestingly, this is also rooted in states' rights. An example of the power of states' rights is when the republican's recently lost their conceal/carry bill that would've allowed those with concealed weapons permits to carry their weapons across state lines and their one permit would be recognized as viable in every state in the Union. The weight of reasoning prevailed and the bill did not get support because it was a slap in the face to individual states' rights. The Republicans tried to make their bill sound like a good thing, something to do with self-defense and protection from bad guys, but, really, it would've eroded an individual state's right to decide whether they wanted to recognize another state's "official" document or not. You know, like when police say, "It's out of your jurisdiction, you can't do a thing about it." The bill, if nothing else, contradicts Republicans' claims that they believe individual states' rights are sacrosanct and, in fact, the thought behind the conceal/carry bill reeks of socialism, not states' rights.

Sotomayor won't take our guns away. At least that's my take. The only time we had our guns taken away was after Hurricane Katrina and you know who was President then. The National Guard took the guns away from everyone they could lay hands on, including citizens who were trying to protect their homes. Republicans were in power then.

Post Wed 29 Jul, 2009 3:42 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
PaulaJane
Moose


Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 795
Location: Maine


 Reply with quote  

Did they eventually give your guns back to you? and everyone else?
_________________
"What goes around, comes around" When it does, watch out!!!

Post Fri 31 Jul, 2009 8:07 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
renadewalt
Wanna-be Mainah


Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 35



 Reply with quote  

Did they return the weapons? Good question! According to this item

http://t17.sl.pt

the NRA won a decision where the state had to return the weapons, but proof of ownership most likely had to be presented and I doubt everyone had proof of ownership.

Post Sun 09 Aug, 2009 12:44 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
PaulaJane
Moose


Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 795
Location: Maine


 Reply with quote  

Thank you renadewalt for your quick response AND a link for me to read it myself. The last sentence did leave a phone number and request that anyone that had not gotten their gun back was to call. Hopefully they were still in the state to read it, or they had online to read it.
_________________
"What goes around, comes around" When it does, watch out!!!

Post Tue 11 Aug, 2009 2:30 am 
 View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
ebarber
Wanna-be Mainah


Joined: 01 Aug 2009
Posts: 7
Location: Ohio


 Reply with quote  

quote:
Originally posted by renadewalt:
Republicans were in power then.


Wait just a second there my friend. I believe the local anti-gun liberal government of New Orleans were the ones swinging the axe on the constitution.
Google is your friend...I Know you only have 8 posts but you are really getting under my skin already with your extreme left slant and all of your political fight picking.

Heres just one of the articles I found quickly...
Hard Times In The Big Easy
Law-abiding citizens were subject to confiscation of their firearms during the Katrina catastrophe.
By John Hay Rabb Posted: 07-21-06 Categories: Second Amendment
Last August, Hurricane Katrina flattened New Orleans and cut a wide swath of destruction across several other southern states. Millions were left dead, injured, hungry or homeless. In the chaotic aftermath of the storm, New Orleans Police Superintendent P. Edwin Compass III announced that all privately owned firearms would be seized. "No one will be able to be armed. Guns will be taken," Compass declared. "Only law enforcement [will be] allowed to have weapons."

Louisiana, like many other states, issues concealed carry weapons permits to law-abiding individuals. Compass's order did not distinguish between stolen guns and legally owned guns; therefore, he was in violation of Louisiana statute.

The governor can temporarily suspend state laws, but only after a state of emergency has been declared. Under his emergency powers, the governor may specifically authorize a senior law enforcement official to confiscate legally owned firearms. To the best of my knowledge, the governor of Louisiana never authorized Superintendent Compass to confiscate legally owned firearms.

After the confiscation order was issued, police and National Guard personnel began searching empty houses for firearms, and TV camera crews filmed numerous instances of forced entry.

California TV station KTVU captured on videotape the most disturbing gun-confiscation incident. An 82-year-old woman stood in her small kitchen, surrounded by police in tactical gear and several TV cameramen. In the open palm of her hand she held a knife and a small revolver. Neither of the weapons was pointed at the police officers.

The police ordered her to hand over the two weapons. When she did not immediately comply with the order, she was gang tackled by three burly police officers, who pinned her to the kitchen floor. The officers then hustled her out to a flatbed truck, lifted her aboard and drove away.

Some police officers told reporters that the confiscation order was issued after Army, Coast Guard and police helicopters were fired upon while flying over the city. It is reasonable to assume that the shooters responsible for these attacks used illegal firearms, which would not simply be handed over when the police and National Guard knocked on the door.

There certainly was no shortage of guns available to criminals. In the wake of the storm, more than 1,000 guns were stolen from gun dealers in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. Only about 130 of these weapons were recovered.

(The Associated Press also reported that some police officers asked if they could borrow guns from citizens. The officers explained that they were outgunned during running street battles with armed criminals.)


In some of the city's wealthier neighborhoods, the houses were relatively unscathed by the storm. Some of the houses were surrounded by armed private security guards.

On several occasions the police temporarily handcuffed the guards and took their firearms. After a few minutes, the handcuffs were removed and the guns returned. All of these incidents took place on private property and involved licensed security personnel. They appear to be clear violations of the U.S. Constitution, the Louisiana Constitution and Louisiana state law.

In the town of Algiers, residents formed their own armed defense force. The men worked in shifts, patrolling the streets 24 hours a day. The Garden District of New Orleans also formed its own armed defense force. Neither of the guard forces fired a single shot.

In time it became clear that the police superintendent's gun-confiscation order stood on shaky legal ground. The National Rifle Association and the Second Amendment Foundation challenged the order in federal court. On September 12 the court issued a restraining order against the New Orleans Police Department. No more guns could be confiscated, but the guns that had already been confiscated would not be returned to their rightful owners.

The gun-confiscation program in New Orleans may be an ominous indication of how governments will react to a future catastrophe, either natural or man-made.

After Katrina hit, the NOPD was in shambles. Emergency calls went unanswered, some officers abandoned their posts, and others participated in the looting spree. But even in this crisis atmosphere, Superintendent Compass managed to round up some police officers and National Guardsmen to go door to door, confiscating guns from law-abiding citizens and leaving them helpless against the depredations of armed criminals.

The New Orleans city government has a long history of antipathy toward private gun ownership, and there are many large cities dominated by anti-gun mayors and city councils. If, God forbid, there is another terrorist attack on a major city, law-abiding gun owners should be prepared for the "New Orleans treatment."

Post Fri 28 Aug, 2009 6:28 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
renadewalt
Wanna-be Mainah


Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 35



 Reply with quote  

Exactly how many "left wing extremists" do you know? I suspect you don't know any. You sound like a reactionary who is afraid of everything. I feel sorry for you.

As to your "argument," suggesting that New Orleans Police Chief Eddie Compass was part of a vast left-wing conspiracy of anti-gun liberals is ludicrous and easily refuted. New Orleans police are the most notoriously corrupt, murderous gang of grifters in America. And if you think the National Guard is locked into following the orders of your scary liberal Louisiana governor, scary police chief or your scary liberal NO mayor, you've been listening to way too much AM corporate blab radio and corporate TV.

The quality of the "debates" here is extremely poor. You and those on your side of the "aisle" have lost the ability to discuss or argue with anyone constructively. You have all been reduced to insulting those who have a different opinion because you have been led to believe that you don't need proof, all you need to do is repeat something enough times and you get to the tipping point where you all start to believe it. And thanks to you, it just gets worse.

You really had nothing to backup your arguments when blaming "The Left" for the confiscation of guns during the days after Katrina.

Sorry if you got pissed off. That's life, my friend. Perception is NOT reality.

Post Sun 30 Aug, 2009 2:47 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
ebarber
Wanna-be Mainah


Joined: 01 Aug 2009
Posts: 7
Location: Ohio


 Reply with quote  

I had a big drawn out response but I ended up editing it out. You know debating politics with you isnt the reason why im here on this forum. Im here to discuss and read about Maine. You my friend arent worth my breath and I wouldnt sway you one way or the other anyways...I just get sick of hearing your misinformation and it fired me up. Im withdrawing from this conversation and all future conversations with you.
If I could find an ignore button id use it. At any rate goodbye to you renadewalt.

Post Mon 31 Aug, 2009 12:42 am 
 View user's profile Send private message
Leonard of Old Town
Lobstah


Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 559



 Reply with quote  

Many people objected to Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court because she "lacked judicial temperament" that is, she is prone to fly off the handle, to get angry and yell on the bench.

To her credit, she hasn't knifed anyone, dealt drugs, or bitten a baby or beaten an infant to death.

Why is it that they have such difficulty controlling their emotions?

Are they merely "hot-blooded" as Governor Schwarzenegger once claimed?

Post Thu 04 Mar, 2010 8:01 am 
 View user's profile Send private message
  Display posts from previous:      

Your Maine Forum Forum Index -> Politics



Forum Jump:
Jump to:  

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 1 of 1


Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

 

Last Thread | Next Thread  >
Powered by phpBB: © 2001 phpBB Group